Logo Logo
 Search  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Login  |  Home 
Quick Search  Quick Search
About Agilent  |   Products & Services  |   Industries  |   International  |   Online Stores
Home > Products & Services > Test & Measurement > Technical Support > Metrology Forum
Metrology Forum : Technical Articles

Microwave Instrument Advances

About this Article
This paper by Ian Instone was first presented at an IEE colloquium in January 1996, "The Use of Software and Firmware in Measuring Instruments".

Network Analyzers

Until comparatively recently characterizing passive microwave components could be a tedious task if sufficient measurements are performed across the frequency band to ensure that the device has a predictable response. An apparently simple device such as a fixed attenuator needs three parameters measured involving two different sets of test equipment. These are the attenuation and the mismatch that must be measured at each port. Another complication arises because the measured values will be influenced by effects related to the measuring equipment and its interaction with the device being calibrated. Consequently these devices would often have only been measured at one or two frequencies and their response at other frequencies either predicted or interpolated. With the initial development of network analyzers during the early 1970s the situation changed dramatically.

Network analyzers are instruments designed to measure all the necessary parameters of "two port" networks simultaneously. Measuring in this way makes it possible to assess the dependency of the measurements upon each other and on the measuring equipment. Early analyzers took the form of several independent measuring instruments interconnected together and controlled by an external computer. These systems had many limitations over present day instruments, some of these being:

  • Space: A typical network analyzer system required a vast amount of space, often occupying around three two metre high instrument racks.
  • Stability: The high frequency sources used in these systems were thermionic devices. Synthesized sources were normally only constructed using solid-state components but unfortunately these tended to be limited to UHF frequencies and below. Non-sythesized sources have a much higher residual frequency modulation and phase modulation content which results in a larger IF (Intermediate frequency) bandwidth being necessary in the receiver. Larger bandwidths produce higher noise that reduces the useful dynamic range over which stable measurements can be performed.
  • Speed: These systems comprised of many interconnected instruments distributed over several racks which limited the operating speed to that governed by the slowest instrument within the system. In addition computers were very expensive so appreciable cost savings with no adverse effects upon measurement accuracy were possible by compromising the computer.

Of course, the network analyzers were a big improvement on the traditional measurement techniques in use at that time. These usually involved a receiver to measure loss and a slotted line to perform the impedance measurements in the form of standing wave ratio (SWR). Using these instruments it was possible to measure phase angle but this was often beyond the scope of many people due to the mathematics involved. Measurements performed using these instruments were time consuming and had to be performed individually at each frequency. Wide-band signal generators were not available until a few years later so a separate signal generator was required for each frequency band where measurements were performed. To fully characterize a "simple" device such as a resistive attenuator would need a large amount of very expensive test equipment and would take several hours. There was a temptation to perform only a few of the easier measurements and make assumptions (or interpolate) about the values at other frequencies. Fortunately, the instruments used at this time had one saving grace, their accuracy. Slotted lines were carefully made exploiting the best conditions and manufacturing equipment available at the time whilst the receivers performance was usually enhanced by employing a physical standard such as a piston attenuator as a reference. Network analyzers on the other hand, had mediocre accuracy which is improved by using a technique known as error correction. In modern instruments this is performed in "real time" using the analyzers internal processor, where as the earlier generation of systems would employ external computers.

What Is Error Correction ?

Consider this simplified circuit diagram of a typical two-port device (a fixed attenuator). Simplified attenuator diagram

Measurements normally made on these devices are the loss from input to output and the impedance at the input and output ports. These measurements are most useful if they are performed in the transmission medium in which the device is designed to operate, in most cases this will be 50 ohm. With the device shown above when the input is driven by a source it will have a loading effect which will affect the amplitude of the signal at the input port. Similarly the load of the measuring equipment on the output port will affect the amplitude of the measured signal. Generators and receivers are rarely a good match to the 50 ohm system, i.e. their impedance isn't 50 ohm. Before network analyzers were in common use, tuners would be fitted to the output port of the signal generator and to the input port of the receiver so that they could be tuned, at that particular frequency, to be as close as possible to the characteristic impedance of 50 ohm as possible. This process would have to be repeated at every frequency where measurements were made. On the other hand, the network analyzer measures the device without the benefit of tuners. Prior to measurement the network analyzer is characterized using several known but simple devices. The device is then measured, the effects of the network analyzer upon the measurements calculated and subtracted from the measured values. This leaves a set of "error corrected" values for the device under test.

Network analyzers rely on good quality standards and precise mathematical modeling of them for their accuracy. These standards are usually an open circuit, a short circuit and a load. The load must be as close as possible to the characteristic impedance (50 ohm or 75 ohm) across the frequency range to be measured. The open and short circuits are the easiest to achieve and verify using traditional measurement methods where possible. The load has the greatest effect upon the measurements and is also the hardest item to manufacture. Various methods can be used to eliminate the load from the measurement, the most common being the use of sliding load. The sliding load consists of a length of precision transmission line along which the load is moved. When the sliding load is moved it will produce a circle when its impedance is observed on a polar diagram. The center of this circle represents the impedance of the airline, thereby removing the load from the measurement process. A modern development of this technique involves the use of a short piece of precision transmission line fitted to the front of the load. Since the length of the line is known it is possible to calculate the phase shift introduced when using and not using the line. Having established the phase shift it is now possible to calculate the center of the circle and therefore remove the load from the equation leaving just the precision transmission line as the reference standard. The open circuit is the second hardest to manufacture. It can be replaced by the short circuit and the same short precision transmission line described above. For these test methods to be effective we must have the following:

  1. measurements of both phase and magnitude
  2. known and characterized standards
  3. a means of calculating the results

Network analyzers have become possible in the last 25 years because computers and microprocessors have made the necessary mathematics invisible to the user. For instance the correction equation for the impedance of a two port device takes the form: S-parameter formula

The terms preceded with "S" are the measured parameters of the item being calibrated and those preceded with "E" relate to the network analyzer and are assessed during the initial error correction procedure. Each of the quantities is complex, and a similar expression will be required for each of the remaining parameters. In addition, the equations are required at each frequency where measurements are required. Before computers or calculators the mathematics would have been very time consuming which made this method of measurement impractical. With the first generation of network analyzer, the computer often performed the calculations in less time than was required for the measurements to be performed. It became normal practice to measure attenuators, cables, couplers etc. at frequencies up to 12.4 GHz (defined by the equipment available) at 500 MHz intervals in a little under an hour, including the initial error-correction.

The basic network analyzer changed a little during the 1970s taking advantage of the emerging technologies. As solid state sources became available at higher frequencies they replaced the previous thermionic devices. These advances quickly produced an extended frequency range and up to 18 GHz became available as an option. In addition the emerging technologies allowed the computer to take control of the amplitude of the source making active device characterization more of a reality. The rapid advances in computer technology allowed a more friendly and flexible user interface coupled with the ability to perform measurements at many more frequencies. The biggest single advance occurred around 1983 when the computer was placed inside the network analyzer The entire system was redesigned producing a complete self contained system occupying one instrument rack approximately 1.5 metres high. With the computer located inside the instrument the limitations posed by transmitting data through long bus cables was eliminated so a "real time" display of the corrected measurements was provided on the internal CRT display. In addition an option was included where the internal computer could display the data in the time domain, allowing the operator to investigate discontinuities etc. in his structure. The time domain display was further enhanced using a feature known as "de-embedding". De-embedding is a process where markers are positioned around the time domain display of an item which is buried within a structure. The display between the markers is then computed back into the frequency domain so that the parameters of the device can be assessed whilst it is still connected and active within the circuit. This process is used to great effect when the network analyzer develops a fault in one of the microwave components, it is possible to look inside the analyzer and locate the faulty component without taking any of the covers off the instrument.

During the 1980s improvements were made to the display, operating frequency range, size, functionality and price of these instruments. Most of these instruments now carry a substantial amount of memory which enables them to record the results of several hundred measurements. Most instruments now have an internal disk drive which doubles as memory for recording results, and also provides them in a format which can be processed away from the instrument at a later date. Modern instruments can act as instrument controllers in their own right, controlling such instruments as power meters. This enables precise power levels to be set-up prior to device measurement so parameters such as gain compression can be measured more accurately. In the latter half of the decade the "economy" range of network analyzers were released. These provided all of the functionality of the "full price" analyzers at under half the cost. The only area where performance has been compromised is in the design of the microwave source, it produces substantially less power than that in the other instruments therefore limiting the dynamic range slightly. Couplers have been used have been employed in the lower cost instruments instead of "tri-axial" bridges. These reduce the cost of the instrument by several thousand pounds at the expense of the low frequency performance which is compromised slightly.

The recession of the 1990s brought about customers who specified the instruments they required much more precisely. It was no longer acceptable in the market place to produce an instrument which could measure all known parameters and expect it to sell regardless of cost. Manufacturers had to listen to their prospective clients and build instruments which met the specification. Customers are not willing to pay for features or performance which will not be utilized. At the same time many customers are demanding that their instruments might be upgraded in the future to meet their unforeseen needs at that time. The use of "upgradeable" firmware within the instrument helps to meet this requirement. For instance upgrading a standard "economy" network analyzer to perform measurements in the time domain is can be performed by the user with a 3.5 inch disk supplied by the manufacturer. The process takes a couple of minutes. To prevent the disk being used to upgrade more than one network analyzer it is encrypted with some data relating specifically to the analyzer submitted for upgrade. Software and firmware is available for many of the measurement tasks performed using network analyzers, including:

  1. Antenna Measurement
  2. Dielectric Measurement
  3. Transistor Parameters
  4. Amplifier Characterization
  5. Power Sensor Calibration
  6. Fault Location (in cables etc.)
Spectrum Analyzers

Spectrum analyzers are another instrument which have benefited greatly from the inclusion of microprocessors. Early microwave spectrum analyzers were more akin to low frequency instruments with an input mixer and local oscillator added. Unfortunately, as described earlier, wide band oscillators were not available therefore to keep the spectrum analyzer to a manageable size and cost an available oscillator coupled to a harmonic mixer was employed. By the nature of the way that they work, harmonic mixers will produce some undesirable effects. These include an image of the signal being measured at every harmonic generated within the mixer. Also, because the mixer was designed to produce harmonics, it will also create harmonics using the signal under test. These effects can be either compensated for, or can be identified in some way and ignored by a suitably qualified operator. To reduce these effects a pre-selector was added as an option. This is a filter placed before the RF mixer which ensures that only the frequency which the spectrum analyzer is tuned to is applied to the mixer. The preselector helps to prevent the mixer from becoming overloaded and therefore reduces many of the "harmonic and spurious" signals generated. A further complication arises because the preselector must track the input frequency of the analyzer exactly. This was not easily achievable so a tracking control was provided. This further complicated the operation of the instrument. Microprocessor controlled spectrum analyzers started to evolve around 1980. The major benefit was their ease of use over earlier instruments. The choice of scan time and resolution bandwidth settings could now be left to the microprocessor to optimize. If the operator chose a some instrument settings which would have produced an out of calibration display the microprocessor would reset the instrument to the most appropriate settings closest to those desired so that measurements would not be compromised. The operator was still left with the choice of overriding the microprocessor, and would be reminded with a display on the screen if their combination compromised the measurements.

Adding the microprocessor reduced the quantity of manually performed internal adjustments on the analyzer For instance, instead of adjusting the preselector to track the analyzer at all combinations of sweep speed and scan width using a multitude of potentiometers, inductors and capacitors it was now possible to perform a few fairly crude adjustments and then let the microprocessor perform the remaining adjustments whilst the instrument was performing measurements. The microprocessor also brought with it the ability to control every instrument setting remotely using a computer. Data is transmitted in either direction, so the instrument can be set-up and then interrogated to provide the measured values. Signal identification is provided using the marker, as is the facility to lock the analyzer to a signal which is drifting.

Through the 1980s the spectrum analyzers performance and features improved as microprocessors became cheaper. The perceived accuracy was always a problem with these instruments and the microprocessor was again able to help. Data is stored in ROM relating to the performance of various components in the RF signal path. These values are implemented as corrections when necessary. Normally corrections are applied for frequency response, IF and RF linearity and attenuator errors and errors introduced when changing resolution bandwidth.

Another significant enhancement was realized when digital filters were introduced. Making measurements using the spectrum analyzer always involved compromises between speed, bandwidth and sweep time. With digital filters these compromises were no longer significant. With a digital filter the signal is measured using a wider bandwidth and the response is mathematically interpreted using the internal microprocessor. Digital resolution bandwidths are 3 to 600 times faster than comparable analogue filters. The reduced bandwidths provide the spectrum analyzer with a full 100dB on-screen calibrated display. Resolution bandwidths of 1Hz on spectrum analyzers operating up to 50GHz are now available.

As customers became more selective in their choice of instruments it became necessary to tailor them exactly to their requirements. The familiar "smart card" was the vehicle chosen since it was fast and cheep. Various programs, measurement algorithms etc. were stored in the memory of the smart card and used to configure and control the analyzer In this way one Spectrum Analyzer could be used for several different functions by simply changing the smart card, for instance without any smart card it remains a general purpose laboratory analyzer, an EMC smart card will adapt it to perform EMC pre-compliance measurements and another smart card could be used to perform some of the measurements necessary when checking mobile telephones. The modern spectrum analyzers are able to act as instrument controllers in their own right so the smart card can be configured to drive instruments, printers, plotters, disk drives, etc. which are external to the analyzer The guide for writing code on smart cards is made available to customers and third parties so that instruments can be customized on a "one off" basis if necessary.

When the spectrum analyzer is connected to an external harmonic mixer to perform measurements at very high frequencies the microprocessor is able to calculate where spurious signals generated within the mixer are likely to occur and identify them on the display. This process reduces the skill level which was necessary when operating earlier instruments.

The all important subject of routine maintenance and calibration is addressed for some analyzers in the form of a module which fits to the rear of the instrument which performs high level diagnostics, various self tests, and key adjustment procedures. The module controls both the spectrum analyzer and the necessary external test equipment. Adjustments are performed using the analyzers microprocessor to generate corrections for the errors determined in the calibration routine. The errors are stored in the analyzers memory. Smart cards are available for the following spectrum analyzer applications:

  1. Cable TV Measurements
  2. EMC Measurements
  3. GSM Measurements
  4. Digital Radio Measurement
  5. Phase Noise Measurement
  6. TV Broadcast Measurements
  7. Scalar Network Measurements
  8. Noise Figure Measurements
  9. Link Measurements
    and many others.
Signal Generators

Microwave signal generators have benefited from the introduction of microprocessors into their design. Many of the adjustments necessary to produce a wide band, stable, constant amplitude source are now performed by the microprocessor each time the output frequency or amplitude is altered. In order that clean, harmonic free signals are produced many modern signal generators include a YIG filter which tracks the output signal. Since these are a magnetic structure there will inevitably be some hysteresis which must be compensated for. Earlier designs of signal generators fitted with YIG filters accepted that it would not be possible to tune the YIG to the output frequency at every point by compensating for the additional loss in a degraded maximum output amplitude specification. The addition of a microprocessor results in the filter being optimized every frequency allowing the signal generator to produce higher amplitude signals at its output socket.

Many signal generators now have very tight specifications regarding the output amplitude accuracy despite the hardware used in the output stages of them having changed little over the last 20 years. These tight specifications are only possible because the complete signal generator is calibrated after manufacture and the measured errors stored in a ROM to be used as correction values by the microprocessor when the instrument is used. The use of microprocessors and their respective firmware enables instrument designers the freedom to use established designs of hardware and to compensate for the inadequacies using correction values stored in the instruments memory.

Oscilloscopes

Oscilloscopes have had a "bumpy ride" as microprocessors have been incorporated into their design. The first generation of programmable oscilloscopes had a bland front panel with several pushbuttons and one control knob. This was an excellent design concept if the instrument was only ever going to be operated using a computer, but if it was to be operated manually the multilayer menus were so different from the traditional analogue instrument that few engineers were able to operate them efficiently. As digital oscilloscopes have evolved design engineers have tried to recapture the traditional analogue feel without compromising performance. To a large extent this has been very successful with the modern 50GHz oscilloscopes being easier to operate than the familiar analogue instruments . Much of this is due to the short cuts built into the firmware, for instance in order to initially display a signal the microprocessor sets the timebase and amplitude to display two complete cycles over the center eight divisions of the display. Very often there will be a "stats" (statistics) button which instantly provides a display of repetition rate, peak to peak amplitude, peak amplitude, average and RMS values. Another "stats" control might provide values for rise and fall time, duty cycle, overshoot and undershoot. All of this information is also available over the instrument bus.

Many of the microwave oscilloscopes also include a very fast pulse generator for use as a Time Domain Reflectometer. With the modern instruments having a 50GHz bandwidth, the location of faults in fairly lengthy pieces of cable can be located very accurately.

It goes without saying that modern oscilloscopes are able to produce hard copies of their measurement data using a wide range of printers, plotters and disk drives. This has made the Polaroid cameras used during the 1960s and 1970s redundant. The modern inkjet or laser printer produces a much clearer image which can be enhanced with markers to show measured values at certain points. If desired, all of the measurement data used to create the display can be printed or saved on a disk.

Summary

The use of microprocessors and firmware in measuring instruments has revolutionized metrology. Measurement techniques, which a few years ago would have been considered uneconomical to perform are now executed routinely, and often by relatively unskilled operators. The ability to monitor a components parameters whilst it is connected in a circuit, without introducing additional loading effects helps to speed up the development cycle of many devices.

The quantity of measurements performed on any individual item has increased to the extent that we have a much better knowledge of the how the items behave with changes in amplitude, frequency etc.. For points where measured values are not provided we can interpolate with more confidence. These benefits ultimately help to raise product quality.

Explore

Articles

Basics

Contents

Download

Just for Fun

Metrology Forum Home

Metrology News & Events

Standards

Worldwide

Also in this Section
 
--------------------
Copyright 2000 Agilent Technologies | Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Statement